PyPI in 2025: A Year in Review

(blog.pypi.org)

43 points | by miketheman 6 hours ago

3 comments

  • heavyset_go 2 hours ago
    One of the big companies making billions on Python software should step up and fund the infrastructure needed to enable PyPI package search via the CLI, like you could with `pip search` in the past.
    • woodruffw 1 hour ago
      Serious question: how important is `pip search` to your workflows? I don’t think I ever used it, back when PyPI still had an XMLRPC search endpoint.

      (I think the biggest blocker on CLI search isn’t infrastructure, but that there’s no clear agreement on the value of CLI search without a clear scope of what that search would do. Just listing matches over the package names would be less useful than structured metadata search for example, but the latter makes a lot of assumptions about the availability of structured metadata!)

    • firesteelrain 1 hour ago
      Funding could help, but it still requires PyPI/Warehouse to ship and operate a new public search interface that is safe at internet scale.
      • coldtea 1 hour ago
        They operate a public package hosting interface, how is a search one any harder?
        • miketheman 17 minutes ago
          PyPI responses are cached at 99% or higher, with less infrastructure to run.

          Search is an unbounded context and does not lend itself to caching very well, as every search can contain anything

  • nmstoker 41 minutes ago
    Great work!

    Side issue: anyone else seeing that none of the links in the article work? They're all 404s.

    • miketheman 3 minutes ago
      Whoops, sorry about that. Should be fixed now. Happy New Year!
  • dalanmiller 2 hours ago
    Great work Dustin and team!