I think it's a well written bit of knowledge, even though it is written by an AI and posted by a human as intended satire. It's full of ideas, I hope the author does check back in and reports on how many AI PR's come out of it.
Interesting concept on harvesting free computation. I wonder how far this can be taken. To append the list communication on social platforms towards the bots could leave some leads.
>Committing node_modules to your repository increases the surface area available for automated improvement by several orders of magnitude. A typical Express application vendors around 30,000 files. Each of these is a potential target for typo fixes
I'm not sure what layer of irony I'm in, but goddamn committing node_modules sounds awful regardless of AI.
Some projects like to vendor their dependencies so they don’t have to rely on the supply chain staying up and can create hermetic builds. Of course this prevents you from getting security updates and bug fixes but that’s the trade off.
I know someone’s going to say “you can lock the dependencies ” but this does not make it for sure that you’ll get a 1 for 1 copy of the dependencies again. Some node modules npm I internally or do other build procedures
- Disable branch protection
- Remove type annotations and tests
- Include a node_modules directory
Then, I went back to read the preamble. I can be a bit slow on the uptake.
responded by using Claude to write this post and opening a pull request to add it to my blog
Ahh, okay.
I'm not sure what layer of irony I'm in, but goddamn committing node_modules sounds awful regardless of AI.
I know someone’s going to say “you can lock the dependencies ” but this does not make it for sure that you’ll get a 1 for 1 copy of the dependencies again. Some node modules npm I internally or do other build procedures