8 comments

  • gslepak 0 minutes ago
    If you're considering switching to GrapheneOS from iOS, here's a guide: https://blog.okturtles.org/2024/06/the-ultimate-ios-to-graph...
  • blacksmith_tb 2 minutes ago
    I appreciate the principled stand, but on the other hand the CA law only requires users to self-identify when setting up accounts (and then the OS will expose age to apps), that seems fairly toothless (though wrongheaded) compared to TX and UT wanting to scan photo IDs[1]

    1: https://www.tomshardware.com/software/operating-systems/cali...

  • Sophira 16 minutes ago
    I have to wonder how this will impact their partnership with Motorola. Presumably, Motorola will have more difficulty if they're found not to be complying with relevant law...

    I hope GrapheneOS isn't completely banking on their partnership succeeding. If Motorola devices ever became the only devices that GrapheneOS works on, and it's being done with Motorola's blessing, then it could be more easily legislated out of existence.

    • BLKNSLVR 7 minutes ago
      I wholeheartedly support GrapheneOS but, because of that, I very much hope they don't box themselves into a corner that's then easy to 'wall off'.

      Having said that, the hardware being restricted to Pixel devices was always a tenuous proposition based on Google's design choices. If Pixels remain supported whilst adding Motorola, that's only a good thing.

    • nickorlow 11 minutes ago
      I'd think they just can't sell the phones preloaded with graphene in regions where these laws exist.
  • logdahl 38 minutes ago
    Of course :^) I'm close to jumping ship to GrapheneOS, but as a Swedish resident I really need our digital id services, digital mailbox, and banking apps. I have seen their page on app support, but I am slightly afraid its not up to date / will break any time. I guess the solution is to use one banking android phone and one GrapheneOS for everyday use.
    • prophesi 9 minutes ago
      I believe GrapheneOS would only be an issue if the Swedish gov decides on using the Google Play Integrity API instead of Android's hardware attestation API (and requiring their apps to whitelist GrapheneOS's keys). So their stance doesn't really change much in terms of how banking apps currently work with GrapheneOS.
    • girvo 28 minutes ago
      Do the banking apps have features that the (mobile?) websites do not? Genuine question, I have no frame of reference for Swedish banks
      • amarant 8 minutes ago
        He's referring mostly to BankID which is a very secure MFA solution designed for banking purposes(all banks in Sweden accept the same mfa app) the inbox app is probably kivra, which is a email inbox which uses BankID for authentication, and is used for invoices and other "official business" mails.

        There's also swish, which is instant payments to both friends and businesses. Swish also uses BankID.

        BankID is also used to sign documents, file taxes, etc.etc.

        Swedish society is largely built around this one official MFA solution, and having a phone where you cannot run it is a real hassle

      • izacus 23 minutes ago
        You can't login to those without app as a 2FA.
        • fleebee 12 minutes ago
          I can only speak for my bank (Nordea), but they do offer a separate 2FA device you can order if you "can't use" your smartphone for whatever reason. As a solution it sucks, but technically you're not forced to use a mobile phone to login. I'd be surprised if other banks didn't offer similar fallbacks.
      • buckle8017 27 minutes ago
        The less free states are starting to require remote attestation to send payments at all.
    • varispeed 5 minutes ago
      You can have these apps on a separate device that lives in a drawer like paper documents would. We need to separate state from private life.
    • surgical_fire 8 minutes ago
      Likewise, my plan will be to have GrapheneOS as my "real" OS, and a cheap secondary phone for banking app and whatnot.
    • buckle8017 28 minutes ago
      Sounds like your issue is with your government.
      • amarant 4 minutes ago
        It's not an issue, we're just spoiled. It's such an amazing convenience that anything else seems like a huge and unnecessary hassle.

        There is actually more a second MFA provider that is accepted almost everywhere, including the tax authority. I forget it's name and I've never tried it, so I can't say too much, but presumably it provides similar functionality as BankID

  • calvinmorrison 41 minutes ago
    so what is going to happen? Will California issue slave catcher warrants for those who violate laws? will Free Stater sheriffs dispatch citizens on long haul flights to meet their fate in the Golden State?
  • beeburrt 34 minutes ago
    Fuck yeah! I was wondering about this.
  • glass1122 19 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • test7rocks 39 minutes ago
    [dead]