18 comments

  • ouked 3 hours ago
  • 2b3a51 13 minutes ago
    > "He noticed that the scales were overlapping one another in different directions — in one, they overlapped on top of each other in a clockwise pattern, and the other was in reverse. The fresh eyes of a person who hadn’t been staring at Paulinella for hours identified a curious, distinctive trait. Were they looking at two different species?"

    I found it reassuring that sketching what you see down the microscope is still part of a scientific practice. Also the 'fresh eyes' could perhaps point the way to a more collegiate organisation of research.

  • staplung 1 hour ago
    If you have a decent microscope and want to work on some citizen science that's directly related to the research in this article: https://www.vanettenlab.org/paulinella-consortium
  • GTP 2 hours ago
    I have an idea on how life could originate in a motel room :D
  • grantsucceeded 46 minutes ago
    this revives my recurring desire to get a good USB microscope. Good, to me, in this context:

    a few hundred bucks

    able to look at microbes

    also able to look at less micro level stuff, like maybe the thing i'm trying to solder or fix

    is it wrong to solicit comments/recommendations here?

  • Beijinger 1 hour ago
  • tpict 2 hours ago
    I wonder what the author thinks steampunk means
    • dekhn 2 hours ago
      Right- that's really just a version of a worm pick. I use similar tools (including a mouth pipette... remember kids, in chemistry: don't pipette by mouth, in biology: oops I think I just inhaled something!) working with tardigrade. If it was steampunk there would be some sort of goggles, leather, gears, and a tincture of laudunum.
  • alpineman 2 hours ago
    All they needed was a blue UV light
  • realo 28 minutes ago
    Quoting the article:

    "The team — brought together, in part, by disruptions and despair over the Trump administration’s freezes to federal science funding — then made an exciting discovery."

    Apparently this is the new way of life for Scientists under the Trump regime.

    Sad.

  • danso 3 hours ago
    • Barbing 1 hour ago
      Thank you! (Also, haven’t seen this kind of gift link that has the little login requirement, suppose they’re looking to strike a better balance.)
    • lokeshramchand 1 hour ago
      Thank you!
  • sva_ 47 minutes ago
    I don't know what I should've expected, but I am a bit disappointed that they in fact did not find these organisms in the motel room.
  • oofbey 2 hours ago
    Why did they work in a motel room? The article kinda implies it had something to do with Trump’s funding cuts, but unless I missed something the connection wasn’t made explicit.
    • dekhn 2 hours ago
      I think it's mainly to be close to the sample collection area while also having a place to do microscopy in semi-privacy. Looking at their equipment, I think they bought everything out of pocket and pay for the hotel on their own.
    • chrisandchris 37 minutes ago
      > The team — brought together, in part, by disruptions and despair over the Trump administration’s freezes to federal science funding — [...]
  • m3kw9 2 hours ago
    I thought they use built up gunk from years in the bathroom to discover new species, so they choose a cheap motel.
  • sevenart 3 hours ago
    non-paywall (perm): https://archive.ph/QpBF1
  • kstrauser 3 hours ago
    Super cool, and I bet housekeeping loved tidying up after turning a motel room into a street biology lab. Honestly, I think I’d prefer to stay in a room previously used to cook meth.
    • _qua 3 hours ago
      You think pond water is the worst thing an $80 motel room has seen?
      • kstrauser 3 hours ago
        > Jugs of brackish water lined the walls. Buckets overflowed with hunks of marsh grass.

        I don’t know, that goes a little above and beyond IMO. One typically doesn’t do science in a house-type setting, for many of the same reasons you don’t carpet a bathroom.

        • Brybry 2 hours ago
          Probably poetic license. You can look at the pictures and see everything looks very clean.

          The jugs are sealed. We can't see any "overflowing" buckets. Looking at some water samples under a microscope is not really that messy.

        • subscribed 2 hours ago
          > for many of the same reasons you don’t carpet a bathroom

          For some reason this is a commonplace in the UK.

          Yeah....

          • stephbook 2 hours ago
            I had a colleague who walked the tiled floor in front of pissoirs in socks..
            • subscribed 2 hours ago
              Ugh, I just realised my imagination is too good :)
        • pengaru 2 hours ago
          > for many of the same reasons you don’t carpet a bathroom.

          someone should inform the orange POTUS of this: https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/did-donald-trump-j...

  • codedokode 1 hour ago
    So $80 is considered a "cheap room"? How is a person supposed to earn $80 a day to pay for it and have something left?

    Also, cells can have scales? Amazing.

    • onlyrealcuzzo 1 hour ago
      It takes ~30 minutes to turn around a nightly hotel room, front desk check-in and other labor can easily make that >1h of labor per room per day.

      Even in the budget industry, your nightly utility usage comes close to $10, consumables are $3+.

      Hotel stays are typically taxed higher than typical sales tax.

      Once you add that in, real estate taxes, and any corporate taxes - you're getting close to the $50 price point...

      That's before you factor in the cost of maintaining the building, or the financing to buy the building itself (or any profit).

      Are we supposed to live in a world where everyone's entitled to be able to stay in hotel rooms for 1 hour of minimum wage labor? Because, until we have far more automation, I don't see how that makes any possible sense.

    • 650REDHAIR 1 hour ago
      $80/day is a cheap room in most of the US and Canada.

      My standards for hotel rooms on road trips are quite low and I will call the crappy motels to avoid the bloated .com booking rates and it’s not very often I find even 1 star hotels under $80/day after taxes.

    • mkirsten 1 hour ago
      Have you stayed at hotels? Most people that work don’t stay at hotels and pay the hotel out of pocket.
      • codedokode 58 minutes ago
        I am not from US and with that money I could rent a tiny apartment for 2-3 days. However, I prefer cheaper accomodation. $80 is super expensive if you have no other place to live.